![]() How Fluoride Harms Rather Than Helps Teeth. The case for the fluoridation of drinking water. I was in the village shop recently when the school bus stopped outside. Within. seconds it. They swept into the shop to strip. It was obvious that they had no thought for the harm. The last of these is. British. Dental Association says it is trying to combat by adding fluoride to the. Caries are caused by bacteria. The most common. bacterium. Streptococcus mutans. The bacteria first gain attachment to. ![]() ![]() Once attached, and given a. Within. the plaque, millions of microbes ferment carbohydrates — sugars and. Could Celiac Disease Be the Cause of Your Lower Abdominal Bloating? Celiac Disease is an intolerance for ingesting gluten, the. Celiac Disease Symptoms (from Those Living with the Disease): An Infographic. Study of 100 cases of Chronic Diarrhoea to find out prevalence of Celiac Disease, in Rajasthan DOI: 10.9790/0853-14770104 www. ![]() And it is this acid that eats. However, after. then we. The highly cultured Sumerians of around.
![]() ![]() BC. and the ancient Egyptian rulers wealthy enough to be buried in the pyramids. Significantly, the poorer and lower classes. But in the nineteenth century ad, and with an. At the turn of the nineteenth century we each ate, on average. It is now around 6. As its price dropped and it. More recently, starchy foods like white bread, polished rice. And as a consequence the incidence. Western countries. As sugary and starchy foods are. Thus the decay which. This is vividly illustrated by a comparison between the. Greenland. Until about 2. Eskimos were free of. On investigation it seemed. And it was. suggested that it. Thus was. fluoride. Elemental fluorine is a pale yellow gas and a. Elemental fluorine does not occur in Nature; it is found only. It has a particularly strong affinity for. In its natural state fluorine is commonly found as. In one it was called . Investigations in the USA showed that this. It was not long before the observation of the staining effects of. In young children whose milk teeth or, later, permanent teeth are. Here the interaction with the. As fluorapatite is believed to be stronger and more. It should be borne in mind, however that, once fully formed. That is. up to. about the age of twelve. Water fluoridation will not strengthen older teeth. Surrounded by plaque this fluoride builds up in the plaque. As. the. concentration of fluoride in the plaque increases, the bacteria's metabolisms. Less consumption means less acid is. Eventually, it is claimed, the. It is thought that some of the. All. living. cells, whether human, animal, vegetable or bacterial, are extremely sensitive to. At. levels as. low as 0. S. Thus. fluoride. Toothbrushing with a fluoridated. It was a study of the entire school. Its authors discovered that by the age of six, fifty. Since then it spread throughout the (mainly English- speaking) world. But in Britain. fluoridation has not. At present only about nine percent of the British. West Midlands or Northeast, drink artificially. In an extensive study, Hartlepool, a. York. which was. not fluoridated. It was quite clear that fluoridated Hartlepool had far fewer. York. The author ascribed this to the fluoride in. Hartlepool's water. And. without any other knowledge of the two towns, one could not argue against the. It was considered that. Above this. concentration the. They also. recommended that member states study other. The question of what was an optimal level of. It. contained no research into the of causation of dental decay, apart from. This was. nothing new as it had long been known that this was the reason why dental decay. Nevertheless, the WHO did not propose any. Neither did the report contain anything on the other research subjects. There was merely a proposal that some research should. The. important. question, of what (if any) was an optimal intake of fluoride remained. This has since been disproved. Far from saving money. It is recognised by. But it is estimated that less than one percent of all. Most treated tap water is used by. Thus for every pound. Added to this waste are. Examples of this are revealed by regional analyses of dental health. Not only are there more dentists in fluoridated areas, the amount. For the purpose of. The. picture that emerges from artificially fluoridated districts is that more. Optimal means the population. Expenditure is. the sum of all. Dentists are those who were practising at the end. The. population levels are estimated at mid- 1. It is important to. Observations in this region do not support. Both. have. the most dentists and the highest expenditure per head of population anywhere. The only other major industrial town is Sunderland, which is also the. Sunderland wins on all counts. Why is it that Newcastle. Gateshead have so many extra dentists if, as they claim, fluoridation reduces. Districts in this region are the . But expenditure in. Birmingham is significantly higher than in less fluoridated Wolverhampton (all. Wolverhampton is now 1. It will be. interesting to see how expenditure levels change and how many more dentists are. Benefits of fluoride on dental caries are not apparent. The claims of benefit for fluoride lie solely in its supposed ability to. But just how strong is the. Hundreds of studies have. But it is very difficult to find proof of such statements. Workers at the Turner Dental School in Manchester found no. The. Harvard School of Dental Medicine also reported that fluoride had no beneficial. Trendley Dean, . It was also he who declared. Since that time, however, he has twice confessed in court that. In a comparative study of tooth decay in 1. Arizona cities, no reduction in decay and filled or missing teeth. The second compared teeth of the. Cameron, Texas whose water contained 0. Bartlett. Texas whose water contained 8 ppm of fluoride. The incidence of tooth decay was. Bette Hileman stated: . The. Director of the Division of Dental Health Services for British Columbia showed. DMFT for both fluoridated and non- fluoridated areas was falling — but the. And a report from Holland. Albert Schatz Ph. D, co- discoverer of streptomycin, a drug which has saved. In the early 1. 96. Dr Schatz studied the. Chile. His work demonstrated that fluoride did not reduce. He also showed that fluoride. In 1. 96. 4 Dr Schatz wrote to the editor of the. Journal of the American Dental. Association. (JADA) with a view to publishing his findings. The editor did not reply. In the. first three months of 1. Dr Schatz sent three copies of his report to JADA. Dr Schatz says. . The. professional. North Shields and South Shields are very similar towns on opposite. River Tyne. But, where South Shields water was naturally fluoridated at 1. North Shields water contained little or no fluoride. In 1. 94. 8 the late Robert. Weaver, then. Senior Medical Officer to the Ministry of Education, compared the two towns and. South Shields was no. North Shields. South Shields. Such a delay appeared to show benefits. Weaver concluded that fluoride at or around 1 ppm did. These showed that after. As the caries- causing effects of carbohydrate foods only damage. In other words, the. And because of this shorter. While it can. truthfully be said. It merely puts it off for a while — comparing ages when dental. In 1. 99. 3 Schatz declared. The only difference is that caries start. Since fluoride does not. As. long ago as 1. Lord Douglas of Barloch referred to the possible delay in the. It is standard practice for dentists to note and record which. Therefore it is a very simple. Yet in official British. The fact that these data are important has been made many. Despite this, the figures for erupted teeth aren? The scientists who wrote this gave as their reference the. Drs J J Murray and A J Rugg- Gunn in 1. This stated. that. Although the WHO document doesn. This is, of course, common medical practice — there is little. That in itself, diminishes the authority of the. This calls for a subjective. If those dentists have already formed an. This is a well- known defect of all fluoridation trials. To. obviate it, such trials should be conducted . None of these studies took steps to avoid such a bias. Sutton found, when he delved deeper, even. Thirty- four studies were fictitious. Forty- six of the listed studies were actually only twenty- three. Data on. deciduous and permanent teeth were listed separately thus doubling the number. Twenty studies were about something else. The most important claim made for fluoridation is that it decreases dental. Contrary to the statement in that WHO book, 2. But, even so, twenty- three studies, if valid, might be. But these, like all the other studies, turned out to be just as. Four could not be verified as they could not be obtained. None was even listed. Index to Dental Literature. Index Medicus. And the. WHO document and countries' subsequent fluoridation. John Colquhoun, was Chief Dental Officer of the Department of. Health. for Auckland, and President of the New Zealand Fluoridation Society and, of. However, he discovered a. As a. result. of what he discovered he came out against fluoridation. Dr Colquhoun explained. Fife, Scotland on 4 September 1. In both the fluoridated and unfluoridated. It was suggested to him that this was due. But he. knew that in the unfluoridated part, very few children used fluoride. Dr Colquhoun realised why, he says, when he examined. He found. the. sorts of evidence presented here. Men in far less public positions had been summarily dismissed. Throughout any country it is not difficult to find a. The United. Kingdom Dental Health League Table, published in November 1. British. Fluoridation Society lists 2. Top of the list with 0. DMFT) is fluoridated Bromsgrove & Redditch; bottom with 3. DMFT is North. Manchester which is unfluoridated. If one picks a fluoridated area with a low. Gateshead and Liverpool are demographically quite. But Gateshead is one- hundred. Liverpool is unfluoridated. Doing this we find that in the 1. York was the sweets manufacturer. Rowntree's. Rowntree's employed a sizeable proportion of the city's population. Thus it is likely that their friends and relatives also had. It is just as likely, therefore, that the reason. York had a. higher decay rate than Hartlepool was not a lack of fluoride in its water. They tell a. different story. One major study conducted for the Ministry of Health measured. Neither showed a significant beneficial. And in terms of. reductions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |